assalamualaikum
in the name of Allah te Most Gracious the Most Merciful
PAS is making headlines again. They have reiterated their stance on their long standing mission to implement hudud.
It was originally brought up by the charismatic Husam Musa in a debate btw PAS vs UMNO in Kelantan. Next, Tuan Guru Nik Aziz politely asked DAP to come up with reasons why they will not accept hudud.
I will leave to the scholars to explain what is hudud. It is not my area of expertise, thus I will do my studies and keep quiet in the meantime.
However, there are 2 things that I think ought to be highlighted here,
1) Mistakes on PAS' side
a : failure to educate - they need to adequately educate the Muslims and Malaysians the whole principals behind hudud. Well educated Muslims have no objections, and those majority poorly educated and want-to-act-like-ones have a lot to talk about, and these people bring more confusions than solutions.
b : Not in Pakatan Rakyat manifesto - in simple words, they can't violate what they had agreed to fight for together in the last election. Work on common grounds first, and slowly start the education process. This is wise to my eyes.
2) UMNO's immaturity
- TG Nik Aziz was saying yesterday 'Hudud ni hukum Allah bukan hukum PAS. Sama macam solat, itu hukum Allah , bukan PAS yang buat.' We know at least PAS is doing something, although the manner is questionable. UMNO on the other hand, is obviously fighting for Islam on papers only. Haven't we heard at all they want to implement hudud. They keep saying previously it is PAS's interpretation of the law, therefore it should be rejected. If it's wrong, then correct it. When are the Islamic scholars in UMNO? Why do you keep quiet?? Why haven't you voiced out your intention to implement hudud? Do you not want hudud? Are you too busy corrupting our money?
Comparing these 2 points, one should not fail to see PAS is trying to something, while UMNO has done nothing but talking rubbish.
Our job is to seek knowledge, so that we know we are talking about.
I am a little sick these 2 days. Will be back to full fitness hopefully this Thursday.
till next time,
assalamualaikum
8 comments:
Encik Dokter, camane bleh sakit ni? Ni bleh manjatuhkan kredibiliti saudara sebgai pengamal perubatan,hahaha, get well soon bro, ble bleh lepak minum ni?
Quoted from your post.
"TG Nik Aziz was saying yesterday 'Hudud ni bukan hukum Allah bukan hukum PAS. Sama macam solat, itu hukum Allah , bukan PAS yang buat.'"
isn't is suppose to be "Hudud ini hukum Allah bukan hukum PAS." or it is really stated like that by TG Nik Aziz.
i think it is proper to correct it if it is a mistake.
Salam,
Bukan nak cakap apa lah saudara, tapi isu "sedekah" di Perak tu PAS buat apa? Tg Nik Aziz comment apa? Macam mana HUDUD yang PAS perjuangkan ini? Bila "kawan" buat leh tutup mata kaa...
Politik jalan nya tidak lurus. Tidak hanya boleh selesai di dalam blog. Tidak hanya boleh selesai dengan berbincang dan tulis2 sahaja. Kita perlu berusaha untuk mengubah apa yang sepatutnya diubah.
Mungkin dah pernah org beritahu sedara, ingatlah selama ini siapa yang menolong kita hingga berjaya. Janganlah cepat merajuk dan marah hanya kerana sekumpulan manusia di dalam kerajaan.
Wassalam
'ingatlah selama ni siapa yang tolong kita sehingga berjaya'.
hahaha. statement xleh blah.
nk ckp BN yg tolong? well. of course diorg kene tlg rakyat sbb diorg diberi tggjwb tu.
cube kalau PKR yg jd kerajaan. diorg pn kne tlg rkyt gak smpi berjaya.
kerajaan bkn milik BN semate2. kerajaan kite terbina atas dasar demokrasi. PKR ade. BN pn ade. so, PKR pn tlg kite smpi berjaya kn?
mmg la politik xleh selesai dalam blog. biar ar blogger ni luahkan pendapat die. ek eleyh. xpuas hati buat blog sndr la. msg2 ade hak bersuare.
ehh.. takkan lah nak comment pun nak halang. tuan punya blog ok jer aku comment.
apa kene mengena pkr dengan comment saya tu.. (payah gak nih). :p
P-Sayur: aku dah sihat sket alhamdulillah..nak lepak2 bole je.dah bnyk kali aku tinggal no aku kat blog ni..ko sms aku nanti no ko.
darkness: dah betulkan.thanks.x perasan lak mula2 tu.
anon: org berbudi kita berbahasa.tp x salah xnak pilih org berbudi tu pemimpin kita, kita pilih yang terbaik.samada maksud anda itu umno atau tidak, pemilihan pemimpin itu berdasarkan pemimpin yg akan memimpin sekarang, kerana pemimpin yg menolong kita dahulu kebanyakan dah meninggalkan kita.
mgkn PR akan memberikan kebajikan yg lebih baik dpd UMNO? kebarangkalian itu sentiasa ada, dan arus perubahan semakin besar..
pilih pemimpin secara akademik, supaya penilaian secara objektif dapat dibuat.kenapa nak pilih pemimpin yg korup semata2 utk sekarang semata2 kerana jasa Tunku Abd Rahman dan Tun Abd Razak?
Post a Comment